The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has officially submitted a closure report in the high-profile death case of Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput, ruling it as suicide. The agency found no evidence of abetment, putting an end to years of speculation and legal battles surrounding the case.
The CBI filed closure reports in two cases linked to Rajput’s death in courts in Mumbai and Patna. The agency concluded that there was no criminal conspiracy or external involvement in the actor’s demise. However, the filing of a closure report does not automatically shut the case, as the final authority lies with the magistrate, who can accept or reject the report.
Sushant Singh Rajput’s Tragic Death and Initial Investigation
On June 14, 2020, Sushant Singh Rajput, 34, was found dead in his Mumbai residence. The initial probe by the Mumbai Police concluded that Rajput died by suicide. The postmortem report confirmed asphyxia due to hanging, and forensic investigations corroborated the findings.
Following widespread public outrage and demands for a deeper investigation, the case was transferred to the CBI in August 2020. The agency’s involvement came after Rajput’s father, KK Singh, filed an FIR in Patna, alleging that his son was driven to suicide due to abetment, financial fraud, and mental harassment.
No Evidence of Abetment or Foul Play, Says CBI
After an exhaustive probe spanning more than four years, the CBI’s final report concluded that no evidence was found to support allegations of foul play. The agency examined forensic reports, digital records, financial transactions, and statements from multiple witnesses before reaching its verdict.
Despite initial claims of possible murder or external involvement, the CBI ruled out any criminal conspiracy. This conclusion aligns with the findings of the Mumbai Police, which had maintained from the beginning that Rajput’s death was a suicide.
Legal Implications: Sushant Singh Rajput Case May Not Be Fully Closed Yet
While the CBI has filed a closure report, the magistrate overseeing the case has the authority to either accept or reject the findings. If the magistrate deems further investigation necessary, the case could be reopened.
Additionally, if any complainant or interested party disputes the CBI’s conclusion, they have the right to challenge the closure report in court. This means that legal proceedings could continue, despite the agency’s findings.
Rhea Chakraborty’s Involvement and Counter-Complaint
One of the most controversial aspects of the case was the involvement of Rajput’s rumoured girlfriend, actress Rhea Chakraborty. She was accused of abetment to suicide, financial fraud, and mental harassment by Rajput’s family. However, the CBI found no substantial evidence against her in connection with Rajput’s death.
In response to the allegations against her, Chakraborty filed a counter-complaint in Mumbai, claiming that Rajput’s sisters had obtained a fake medical prescription for him. This complaint remains a separate legal matter and does not impact the CBI’s closure report on the death case.
Conclusion: A Legal and Emotional End to a High-Profile Case?
The submission of the CBI’s closure report marks a significant legal milestone in the Sushant Singh Rajput death case. However, whether this is the final chapter remains uncertain, as the court’s decision on accepting or rejecting the report will determine the next course of action.
For now, the CBI’s findings reaffirm the initial conclusion that Rajput died by suicide, with no external foul play involved. The case has been one of India’s most debated and emotionally charged legal battles, highlighting the intersection of law, media, and public sentiment.
